COMMON LAW VS MARTIME LAW! WE ARE BEING LIED TO ABOUT LAW!

**Common Law vs. Maritime Law: The Struggle for Justice Under Corrupted Governance**

**Thesis Statement:** Common Law vs. the Law of Water: Corrupted government falsely applies the Law of Water onto the people. Common Law is our God-given right!

---

**Introduction**

Throughout history, the foundations of legal systems have played a monumental role in shaping societies. Among these systems, Common Law has stood out as a bastion of individual rights and justice rooted in tradition, while Maritime Law, or the Law of Water, encompasses a specialized area of legal doctrine focused on navigation and shipping. However, the interplay of these two branches of law exposes a troubling reality: the misuse of Maritime Law by corrupt governments as a means to undermine the fundamental rights guaranteed by Common Law. This essay delves deep into the distinctions between Common Law and Maritime Law, their historical contexts, and the implications of governmental overreach, ultimately asserting the necessity of recognizing and preserving our God-given rights against the encroaching tide of institutional corruption.

---

**1. Understanding Common Law**

Common Law is a body of unwritten laws based on legal precedents established by the courts. Dating back to medieval England, it has evolved as a guiding principle, whereby customs and judicial decisions form the bedrock of legal interpretation. Central to the ideology of Common Law is the belief that every individual possesses inherent rights. These rights are not bestowed by the government but rather are seen as God-given.

The hallmark of Common Law includes the right to a fair trial, the equality of individuals before the law, and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. It thrives on the notion of jurisprudence, where decisions are informed by previous rulings, producing a consistency that reinforces justice. However, its greatest strength lies in its embodiment of the moral compass of society, as it adapts to social changes while remaining anchored to fundamental human rights.

---

**2. The Nature of Maritime Law**

Maritime Law governs activities that occur on navigable waters, essentially regulating maritime commerce, shipping, and navigation. Distinguished from Common Law primarily by its specific scope, Maritime Law derives from various international conventions and treaties, including admiralty principles, which are recognized internationally. This legal construct is necessary for maintaining order on the high seas and fostering international trade. Given its specialized nature, Maritime Law encompasses rules related to ship registration, collation of maritime liens, and the rights of sailors and shipowners.

At its core, Maritime Law is anchored in the need for a legal framework that can address disputes arising from transnational activities. However, the unique characteristics of Maritime Law present significant challenges for ordinary citizens who may unknowingly find themselves subjected to this legal doctrine in contexts far removed from the original intent of maritime regulation.

---

**3. The Intersection and Tension Between Common Law and Maritime Law**

The intersection of Common Law and Maritime Law often emerges in cases where government authority extends its reach beyond its founding principles. The application of Maritime Law to citizens on land is an increasingly common tactic used by corrupt governments seeking to impose their will. Under this new paradigm, individuals are deprived of their Common Law rights and embroiled in a system premised on regulations and statutes that were not meant to govern their land-based existence.

This legal reclassification has profound implications for citizens. By treating ordinary activities as shipping-related, governments can impose maritime jurisdiction, thus circumventing the protections enshrined in Common Law. This phenomenon can be witnessed in tax enforcement, licensing, and regulatory compliance, where governmental entities leverage maritime regulations as a means of control rather than true governance.

---

**4. The Corruption of Government and Misapplication of Maritime Law**

The corruption of governmental institutions is a significant concern when examining the intersection of Common Law and Maritime Law. Overreach occurs when supposed maritime "authorities" exploit their position to extend Maritime Law to areas that should be governed by Common Law. This distortion of justice manifests itself in various forms:

- **Taxation and Fees:** Governments may argue that specific taxes related to water usage or maritime shipping should apply to land-based citizens, using misleading justifications that infringe on their Common Law rights. This leads to a form of taxation without representation, where citizens pay for the privileges of a system designed for international commerce.

- **Regulatory Compliance:** Often, local governments adopt maritime regulations under the premise of maintaining safety and order on navigable land, applying them arbitrarily to enforce compliance. This leads to a dangerous precedent where citizens are enmeshed in a web of regulations that strip away their rights and limit their freedom.

- **Disputes and Legal Recourse:** A citizen embroiled in a legal dispute may find themselves navigating the complex waters of maritime courts, where the rules differ significantly from those of Common Law. This disadvantage can result in unequal treatment, the denial of legal rights, and the erosion of fairness in the judicial process.

These instances illustrate how corrupt governments exploit Maritime Law to consolidate power over their citizens, stripping individuals of their God-given rights while rendering them vulnerable to legal manipulations.

---

**5. Historical Context: Lessons from the Past**

Both Common Law and Maritime Law have historical roots that provide context for the current interplay between the two. The development of Common Law emerged in response to the tyranny of feudal lords, creating a system where individuals could seek redress against those in power. This historical framing is essential in understanding the sanctity of Common Law as a protector of individual freedoms.

Conversely, the origins of Maritime Law can be traced back to ancient trade routes and naval warfare, where international cooperation was paramount. As economies modernized and the world shrank due to advances in transportation and technology, Maritime Law became essential for defining the relationship between states and merchants. Yet, this evolution occurred alongside the continued struggle for individual rights under Common Law, revealing the tensions embedded within the legal system.

The lessons of history cautioned against government overreach and the imposition of unjust laws. Such lessons illustrate the importance of vigilance in preserving the balance between maintaining societal order and safeguarding individual rights.

---

**6. The Call for Awareness and Action**

Given the complexities surrounding Common Law and Maritime Law, it becomes increasingly important for individuals and interest groups to educate themselves and advocate for their rights. Awareness is the first step toward combating governmental corruption that misapplies laws to control citizens.

Interest groups should mobilize to bring attention to the erosion of Common Law rights in favor of maritime overreach. Advocacy campaigns can help raise awareness of the consequences of unlawful taxation, undue regulatory burdens, and unfair legal practices. Additionally, legal experts should offer workshops and educational resources to empower citizens with knowledge of their rights under Common Law, arming them against unjust application.

Moreover, legislative reform may be necessary to clarify the boundaries between Common Law and Maritime Law, ensuring that government authority does not extend into areas that infringe upon individual rights. This may require citizens to unite and press lawmakers for clarity in legal definitions, democratically ensuring accountability and upholding fundamental freedoms.

---

**Conclusion**

The tension between Common Law and Maritime Law highlights significant questions about the nature of individual rights, government authority, and the principles of justice. The analysis reveals the disturbing reality that government institutions, rife with corruption, often misuse Maritime Law to undermine the God-given rights of individuals, swaying them toward a legal system that favors control over justice.

In recognizing this trend, we find an urgent call to action. The onus falls upon every citizen to reclaim their Common Law rights and resist the encroachment of arbitrary authority. By fostering an understanding of the historical contexts, educating ourselves, and advocating for change, we can reaffirm our commitment to justice. It is our duty to ensure that the principles of Common Law — based on fairness, equality, and moral intent — prevail against the tide of bureaucratic overreach. Let us remember that our rights are not merely privileges granted by the state; they are inherent, untouchable rights bestowed upon us by a higher power, worthy of protection at all costs.